Want to keep reading? Get Basic Access now for free!
Sign up now for FREE and get instant access to:
- This article
- Select recruiting news and features
- Breaking news alerts
- David Glenn Show interviews
Content for everyone
The 2026 NFL Annual League Meeting is underway in Phoenix, Arizona, and while the desert sun beats down on executives and coaches, a flurry of rule and bylaw proposals could soon send shockwaves through the league. The Competition Committee, along with teams like Pittsburgh and Cleveland, has submitted a slate of changes aimed at everything from kickoff strategy to officiating oversight.
For the Los Angeles Chargers—a team built on a franchise quarterback, a revamped physical identity, and a razor-thin margin for error in the AFC West—these proposals aren’t just technicalities. They are potential game-changers. Let’s break down each proposal and project exactly how it could affect Justin Herbert, Jim Harbaugh’s squad, and the Bolts’ path to a Super Bowl.
1. Onside Kicks Anytime: A Late-Game Lifeline for Herbert
Proposal: Allow the kicking team to declare an onside kick at any point during the game (currently only permitted in the 4th quarter).
Chargers Impact: Positive / High Leverage
For years, the Chargers have lived in close, chaotic games—from comeback wins to heartbreaking collapses. With Justin Herbert’s arm and a defense that can create stops, the ability to attempt an onside kick in the 2nd or 3rd quarter adds a new layer of aggression.
Imagine the Bolts trailing 17-10 just before halftime. Instead of kicking deep and letting the opponent chew clock, Jim Harbaugh—never shy about unconventional tactics—could call for an onside kick to steal a possession. For a team that often plays from behind due to slow starts, this rule could flip field position battles earlier. The downside? If the Chargers’ special teams remain inconsistent (a historical bugaboo), failed early onside attempts could gift the opposition short fields. Still, with Herbert’s ability to score quickly, the risk-reward tilts in LA’s favor.
2. Kickoff Out of Bounds Penalty: Tighter Leash on Kickoffs
Proposal: When kicking off from the 50-yard line, an out-of-bounds kick would place the ball at the 20-yard line (currently the 25).
Chargers Impact: Neutral to Slightly Negative
LA’s kickoff coverage has been a roller coaster. This change penalizes poor directional kicking more harshly. For Chargers kicker Cameron Dicker (assuming he’s still the man), the margin for error shrinks. A kick that sails wide now costs an extra 5 yards of field position.
However, the Bolts’ return game could benefit. When opposing kickers struggle with placement, LA’s returners—like Derius Davis—would start drives at the 20 instead of the 25, a modest but meaningful improvement. Overall, this rule favors disciplined special teams units. The Chargers’ new coaching staff emphasizes fundamentals, so expect them to adapt quickly, but it’s one more thing to monitor in tight divisional games against Kansas City and Denver.
3. Modified Kickoff Alignment: Extra Man in the Setup Zone
Proposal: Change receiving team alignment requirements, potentially adding an extra player in the setup zone, citing player safety.
Chargers Impact: Strategic Tweak
Safety-driven changes often slow down returns. For the Chargers, who boast explosive returner Derius Davis (a 2023 All-Pro as a rookie), any rule that alters blocking schemes could reduce big-play potential. More players in the setup zone might lead to fewer open lanes, pushing teams to prioritize safe, fair-catch returns.
On the flip side, LA’s coverage unit, which has been prone to allowing chunk returns, could benefit from the added congestion. Fewer violent collisions also help keep key special teamers healthy. This is a net-neutral adjustment but one that rewards coaching preparation—an area where Harbaugh’s staff excels.
4. Expanded Ejection Review: NFL Office Gets a Say
Proposal: Allow NFL personnel to consult with on-field officials on disqualifications for flagrant football or non-football acts, even without an on-field call.
Chargers Impact: Protection for Herbert & Stars
This is a massive win for the Chargers. No team relies more on its quarterback’s availability. If a defender delivers a late, flagrant hit on Justin Herbert and on-field officials miss it (or only throw a flag for a standard personal foul), the league office can now intervene to eject the offender.
For a franchise that has seen Herbert play through cracked ribs and plantar fascia injuries, any rule that deters dangerous hits is welcome. Additionally, with feisty defensive backs like Derwin James Jr. playing on the edge, the Chargers must be cautious—James has been fined and flagged for aggressive hits. Under this rule, he could face retroactive ejection for a non-football act. Still, the net effect protects LA’s most valuable asset.
5. “Clear and Obvious” Correction During Officiating Work Stoppage
Proposal (one-year only): Allow the Officiating Department to correct clear and obvious missed calls if there’s a work stoppage involving game officials.
Chargers Impact: Uncertain, But Potentially Crucial
This proposal is contingent on a referee lockout or strike. Should that occur, the Chargers—who have been on the wrong end of infamous calls (see: 2023 vs. Packers, 2022 vs. Chiefs)—could finally get relief. Herbert has lost games on questionable non-calls (holding, pass interference). The ability to correct obvious errors mid-game would likely benefit high-profile quarterbacks and prime-time teams. LA plays in plenty of both.
Without a work stoppage, the rule is moot. But the very fact it’s on the table signals the league’s awareness of officiating flaws. Chargers fans should root for this to pass, then hope the refs’ labor situation resolves cleanly.
Bylaw Proposals & Other Team Submissions
Bylaws (mostly administrative):
-
International game roster deadlines: With the Chargers’ growing global brand (they’ve played in London and could again), flexible roster reduction dates for Week 1 international games would help avoid travel chaos.
-
Labor Day weekend as business days: Minor but ensures personnel moves aren’t delayed.
-
PUP list practice window after 2 games: Big for a team that often has injured stars (e.g., Joey Bosa, J.C. Jackson in past years). Allowing practice after Week 2 instead of Week 4 gets key players back sooner.
Steelers’ proposal (video/phone calls with 5 UFAs during tampering): This is already the norm. The Chargers, under GM Joe Hortiz, have been active in tampering. Making it permanent preserves their ability to line up travel and deals quickly.
Browns’ withdrawn proposal (trading picks 5 years out): No effect, as it’s dead.
Final Verdict: Chargers Stand to Gain
Of the active proposals, the expanded ejection review and anytime onside kicks offer the most tangible upside for the Chargers. Herbert’s health and Harbaugh’s aggressive instincts could turn these into weekly advantages. The kickoff tweaks require clean execution, but with a full offseason to prepare, LA should adapt.
As the Annual League Meeting votes this week (75% approval needed for each), Chargers fans should watch closely. These aren’t just paperwork changes—they’re the fine print that could determine whether the 2026 season ends with a parade in Los Angeles or another “what if.”